State of Nature

Marc Stier's Home Page • IH52 Home Page • IH51 Home Page • How to Reach Me • Syllabus • Texts • Paper Topics • Examination Questions • Notes on Texts

Action and Happiness
State of Nature
Equality and Rights
Ends of Government
Property
Origins of Government
Forms of Government
Limits on Government
Dissolution of Government
Locke and Contemporary Debates

I. What is the state of nature?

A. Men and women living without government and law.

B. The notion of a state of nature is a relatively new conception—although one that is not original with Locke. It is distinctive in that it supposes that human beings can conceivably live without politics and government.

1. This notion is a dramatic reversal from the previous tradition of political and moral thought, which held that politics is natural to human beings and, for some theorists, central to a good human life.

a. Thucydides, "Funeral Oration of Pericles" holds that taking part in public was central to the happiness of Athenians.

b. Aristotle held that human beings are "political animals." One kind of flourishing life for Aristotle, the life of moral virtue, is learned and lived by means of people "ruling and being ruled in turn."

2. If politics is not natural to human beings, then human happiness is something that does not depend upon taking part in political life. This is supported by Locke’s notion of human ends and happiness.

II. Why does Locke begin with the state of nature ?

A. Defining the ends of government.

1. Locke hopes to find a way to define the ends of government by asking why people in the state of nature would establish a government.

a. Defining the ends of government is important because political conflict and disagreement—and potentially civil war—can result when differences about the purposes of government become great.

B. The State of Nature and the Defense of Equality

1. One of Locke’s argument for the moral equality of human beings presupposes the state of nature.